Purple had failed as would Caravan later (although un-rehearsed), Procol only doing a readaptation of their better stuff, The Nice failing miserably on Ars Longa (etc.) but Floyd managed it well enough, but had to resort to outside help in the name of Ron Geesin. On the A-side, Floyd tried more successfully what many failed to do before them: integrating classical music and the symphonic orchestra and choirs into the rock fusion. No doubt Hypgnosis' cow un-tagged pastoral artwork helped out (it was a fad that Crimson and Zep tried before they did), but that doesn't explain much, especially with the sore studio experience of Ummagumma. Despite the album's flaws and it not always ageing well, I rank in the last category of fans, even if I wonder sometimes how this album became so successful.

Alan Parsons / engineer Releases informationĬD EMI United Kingdom ‎- CDEMD 1072 (1994, Europe) Remastered by Doug Sax with James GuthrieĬD EMI ‎- 50999 028940 2 7 (2011, Europe) Remastered by James Guthrie with Joel PlanteĪHM is a very controversial album, decried by many as boring and pretentious (this usually the Barrett unconditionals pissing on Floyd's successful convalescence of their Syd-loss), almost disowned even by some Floyd members and hailed as the first giant step to the group's ascension to perfection ? it was after their first chart topping album. Haflidi Hallgrimsson / cello (uncredited) Philip Jones Brass Ensemble / brass (1,3) Roger Waters / bass & vocals & acoustic guitar (2), tape, Fx Richard Wright / keyboards (Hammond M102), vocals (3) David Gilmour / guitars, bass, drums & vocals (4)

Atom heart mother cover